On Sunday I posted about the Elmhurst Quarry Flood Control Facility. That one, like the majority of my posts was intended to be informational. This post, Part 2, is very much my personal opinion and a critical piece to understand floodwater management in Elmhurst.
As I mentioned on Sunday, the quarry flood facility is a great asset for Elmhurst. It was designed to prevent flooding like my family personally experienced in 1987. But its most valuable purpose is to protect residents in the immediate vicinity of Salt Creek when it crests. From the quarry photos available at the link above, it does appear that the quarry took water on Friday/Saturday as designed (but I have not confirmed this detail). If it did kick into action it is likely that it protected residents in the vicinity of Salt Creek from also suffering flooding this weekend. Truly the unsung story amid all the damage that did happen.
But what about all the homes not near the creek with piles of water-logged trash this week?
In those cases it is likely a story of supply and demand, and unfortunately, inadequate City policies built up over the years. Demand comes from the fact sewer pipes have a limited size and therefore a limit to how much water they can hold. Supply was the 7″ of rain that fell in 9 hours – an extraordinary rainfall that could max out any municipal sewer system. At some point when there is too much water in the system, the water is going to find another place to go. Add to that years of City water management policies (in my opinion) that have evolved to encourage friendly neighbors during smaller rainstorms, instead of planning for the record-breaking storms.
Examples:
* Connecting downspout systems to the City sewer line means water gets whisked right into the City system. It prevents one neighbor’s discharge from settling on another’s property. But it also means no rainwater off the roof of these homes has a chance to disperse through the lawn before it hits the sewer system.
* The City’s rear-yard drain program offers cost-sharing between the City and interested residents. (This program was available as recently as 2008. I’m not sure of the current availability.) Again, discharge from one home settling into another home’s basement is not a good thing. But backyard puddles for a day or two after a big storm is not the end of the world. Is it worth it to zap that ponding away immediately and right into the City sewers during catastrophic rain events?
The bottom-line? The City sewer system is important. We can’t have flooding on City streets. But if you have a system with only so much capacity for water, have a major rain event AND add additional rain run-off from homes with direct downspout connections and rear-yard drains you are making an impossible situation worse. Some homes and neighborhoods will be tidy and dry. But the water will end up somewhere. And that means other residents will be scratching their heads wondering why so much water ended up in their basement.
The City will need to do a lot of review and analysis to assess this storm and learn from it. New program designs that encourage water management on individual lots AND protect the City in case of major storms will be critical. Sustainable tools like rain barrels and rain gardens can be used to supplement and in some cases replace existing tools without overtaxing the City system that should be limited to keeping streets dry after a storm. Ideas like that are a starting point.
1000 rain barrels and rain gardens wouldn’t have protected every basement in Elmhurst this weekend.
But 1000 direct-tap downspouts and rear-yard drains (however many there are!) certainly didn’t help!